3 Comments
User's avatar
Harold Masters's avatar

Why can’t they? Because it isn’t “affirming” and doesn’t feed their fetish, and because they know they won’t automatically be the winners.

Rory Bowman's avatar

When has the male category EVER excluded a male who claimed a "nonbinary" or "transwo" identity? I cannot recall a single time, and most male leagues are already "open" to competitors of all sexes but effectively inaccessible for reasons of physics and physiology.

There is a reason that world records in every sport with a female category are appreciably different between males and females, and none of them are related to unverifiable claims of "identity."

BeadleBlog's avatar

This is brilliant! Since many states have turned formerly female sports into an open category, while the legal battle continues over allowing mediocre males to make the girls who want to play sports act as extras in their fantasy, maybe leave the old teams to the troons (and any girls who feel sad for them), and create an entirely new category of "biology based sports," or BBS. No need to hold everyone hostage over language manipulation. They've thrown tantrums and refused the creation of a mixed-sex category for them, so leave them to squat in the "girls" sports, no swab test required and all "women and girls" welcome. Meanwhile, BBS (notice no inclusion of the word girl or woman) is signing up females and a swab is required.