Rachel Maddow is an embarrassment to journalism. The argument she creates is just a straw man filled with hyperbolic emotional language that completely avoids the central question: what is the purpose of the female sports category?
Instead, she tries to make this about trans identities and then vilifies anyone who would dare to mention that being female needs to remain the eligibility criteria for the female category of sports.
Her language is completely emotional and hyperbolic. Meanwhile this is not an emotional issue. It is not about any single male or group of males or their identity. It is about males in general. It is a dispassionate observation based on equity, fairness, safety, and risk mitigation in female sports.
Full Transcript below:
